Why the study?
Does intravascular pressure regulate local and global Ca2+ signaling in rat cerebral artery smooth muscle cells?
Does intravascular pressure regulate local and global Ca2+ signaling in rat cerebral artery smooth muscle cells?
Intravascular pressure induces steady membrane depolarization that activates voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, leading to elevated Ca2+ signaling and contraction in cerebral artery smooth muscle cells.
May contribute to myogenic tone in cerebral arteries; hypothesis-generating for human cerebrovascular Ca2+ regulation.
The regulation of intracellular Ca(2+) signals in smooth muscle cells and arterial diameter by intravascular pressure was investigated in rat cerebral arteries (approximately 150 microm) using a laser scanning confocal microscope and the fluorescent Ca(2+) indicator fluo 3. Elevation of pressure from 10 to 60 mmHg increased Ca(2+) spark frequency 2.6-fold, Ca(2+) wave frequency 1.9-fold, and global intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) 1.4-fold in smooth muscle cells, and constricted arteries. Ryanodine (10 microM), an inhibitor of ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channels, or thapsigargin (100 nM), an inhibitor of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase, abolished sparks and waves, elevated global [Ca(2+)](i), and constricted pressurized (60 mmHg) arteries. Diltiazem (25 microM), a voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channel (VDCC) blocker, significantly reduced sparks, waves, and global [Ca(2+)](i), and dilated pressurized (60 mmHg) arteries. Steady membrane depolarization elevated Ca(2+) signaling similar to pressure and increased transient Ca(2+)-sensitive K(+) channel current frequency e-fold for approximately 7 mV, and these effects were prevented by VDCC blockers. Data are consistent with the hypothesis that pressure induces a steady membrane depolarization that activates VDCCs, leading to an elevation of spark frequency, wave frequency, and global [Ca(2+)](i). In addition, pressure induces contraction via an elevation of global [Ca(2+)](i), whereas the net effect of sparks and waves, which do not significantly contribute to global [Ca(2+)](i) in arteries pressurized to between 10 and 60 mmHg, is to oppose contraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan H. Jaggar (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: