IntroductionExtracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) is a lifesaving intervention for in-hospital (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, severe aortic regurgitation (AR) has traditionally been considered an absolute contraindication for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO).Case reportA 63-year-old man with aortic regurgitation experienced IHCA with 50 min of low-flow time. The patient received ECPR and emergent valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) through a rapid multidisciplinary approach. Despite transient focal neurological symptoms in the early post-resuscitation period, the patient steadily recovered and was discharged with a favourable Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) of 2.DiscussionThis case challenges the absolute contraindication of severe aortic regurgitation for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) and ECPR candidacy, demonstrating that a multidisciplinary approach with planned venting strategies and rapid definitive intervention can lead to satisfactory patient outcomes.ConclusionSevere aortic regurgitation may not absolutely preclude candidacy for peripheral V-A ECMO. A pre-emptive approach integrating detailed venting strategies with emergent transcatheter interventions expands the salvageable population with valvular heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: