PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)2 citationsOpen Access

EFLM position statement on the proposed 2025/0404(COD) IVDR Amendment of Article 5.5

CCChrista CobbaertMNMichael NeumaierECEttore Capoluongo

Key Points

  • This position statement critiques the proposed changes to Article 5.5 of the IVDR, emphasizing their potential benefits for diagnostic devices.
  • Evaluated the legislative proposal 2025/0404(COD) to amend IVDR, focusing on Article 5.5.
  • Analyzed the implications of a risk-based regulatory framework for diagnostic devices.
  • Discussed key reforms such as removing equivalence requirements and enhancing laboratory practices.
  • The proposed IVDR amendments aim to reduce administrative burdens and enhance access to innovative diagnostics.
  • EFLM supports the revisions which maintain safety and performance standards while facilitating better diagnostics.
  • Challenges remain including the need for clearer definitions and harmonization across Member States.

Abstract

diagnostic devices (IH-IVDs). As a result, thousands of diagnostic tests have been lost during the transition to IVDR. Restrictions imposed by Article 5.5 of the IVDR have proven particularly harmful for IH-IVDs addressing rare diseases, niche indications, and key developments such as precision oncology and precision coagulation, among others. In December 2025, the European Commission published a targeted legislative proposal (2025/0404(COD)) to amend the IVDR. This EFLM position statement critically evaluates the proposed reforms, with a specific focus on the revision of Article 5.5. The proposal introduces a more proportional, risk-based regulatory framework, reduces administrative burden, modernizes clinical evidence requirements, and strengthens predictability and regulatory capacity. Key improvements include removal of the equivalence justification requirement, recognition of existing laboratory quality management systems, increased flexibility in the use and transfer of in-house devices when justified by patient safety or public health, and extension of the in-house exemption to certain clinical trial laboratories. While the proposal represents a significant step forward, remaining challenges include the need for clearer definitions and harmonized guidance to avoid divergent interpretation across Member States. Overall, EFLM strongly supports the adoption of the revised Article 5.5 as proposed in 2025/0404(COD). The reform maintains essential safety and performance safeguards while enabling timely access to innovative, high-quality diagnostics. By reducing unnecessary regulatory barriers and better reflecting laboratory practice, the proposed revision is essential to prevent patient harm, support innovation, and uphold the original objectives of the IVDR in European diagnostic medicine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cobbaert et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e5cbfa21ec5bbf06983https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0580
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper