PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Abstract Number: Esoc2026ot22 Compound Porcine Cerebroside and Ganglioside Injection Versus Piracetam on Cognitive Function for Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
ZZZ C ZhaoCapital Medical UniversityTLTao LiuCapital Medical UniversityRJRongcai JiangCapital Medical University

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CPCGI on cognitive outcomes in TBI patients.
  • Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind trial recruiting 900 adults with mild to moderate TBI.
  • Participants randomized to receive CPCGI (20 ml/d for 14 days) or piracetam as a control (20 ml/d for 14 days).
  • Follow-up assessment at 1 and 3 months post-treatment using various cognitive assessment tools.
  • Primary outcome measured by MoCA score change after 3 months post-treatment.
  • Secondary outcomes include MMSE scores and GOS-E at 1 and 3 months.
  • Ethical approval obtained, adhering to international ethical guidelines.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Evidence indicates that piracetam and compound porcine cerebroside and ganglioside injection (CPCGI) can improve cognitive levels in TBI patients to enhance functional prognosis, but there is still a research gap regarding the efficacy of CPCGI. Methods This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of CPCGI in improving cognitive and functional outcomes in TBI patients. Results This study is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind trial aiming to recruit 900 adult patients with mild to moderate TBI. After providing informed consent, 600 patients will be randomly assigned to the CPCGI group (20 ml/d, for 14 days), and 300 patients will be randomized to the piracetam group as a control (20 ml/d, for 14 days), followed up for 3 months after treatment. This study protocol is registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000040466). Ethical approval has been granted by the ethics boards of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and other involved institutions, adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki’s ethical guidelines. Conclusions The primary outcome is the change in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score from baseline after 3 months. The main secondary outcome measures include MiniMental State Examination (MMSE) scores, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), and the Barthel Index at 1 and 3 months. Conflict of interest

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e90bfa21ec5bbf06db5https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.2077
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper