Evaluates AI chatbots for accuracy and educational value in pediatric ophthalmology, indicating strong expert consensus on their utility.
< 0.05) but not for Safety. Compared with ChatGPT, lower odds of higher ratings were seen for Grok (OR 0.48) and DeepSeek (OR 0.61). Inter-rater reliability indicated moderate agreement (Fleiss' κ = 0.59) and strong consensus (Gwet's AC1 = 0.87).ConclusionChatGPT showed superior accuracy and clarity, while Gemini and Llama excelled in educational value and safety. High expert agreement supports AI chatbots as adjuncts in pediatric ophthalmology education requiring continued validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shweta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: