PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 2026Economic Geology0 citations

Advanced Argillic Lithocaps Above Chilean Iron Oxide-Apatite Deposits

View Full Paper
RSRichard H. SillitoePTPablo TorresBCBoris Castillo

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the characteristics and implications of advanced argillic lithocaps associated with iron oxide-apatite deposits in northern Chile.
  • Analysis of zoned residual quartz and minerals like alunite, pyrophyllite, and kaolinite in lithocaps.
  • Examination of the spatial relationship between lithocaps and major iron oxide-apatite deposits.
  • Advanced argillic lithocaps exhibit similarities to those in porphyry copper systems, indicating a magmatic vapor source.
  • Lithocaps suggest the presence of magnetite bodies formed at depths of less than 4 km.
  • Potential economic minerals may exist within concealed lithocaps above iron oxide-apatite deposits.

Abstract

Abstract Advanced argillic lithocaps, defined by zoned residual quartz with silicification, alunite, pyrophyllite, dickite, and kaolinite, are recognized above and/or alongside five major iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits in the iron belt of coastal northern Chile. The IOA deposits are centered on massive magnetite bodies formed along the transtensional Atacama fault system during Lower Cretaceous dioritic magmatism. Subsequent erosional degradation reduced the size of the lithocaps as well as removed those that are thought to have formerly overlain other magnetite deposits in the belt. The IOA lithocaps closely resemble those documented from the shallow parts of porphyry copper and subvolcanic tin systems and must have formed by condensation and absorption of large volumes of magmatic vapor into groundwater aquifers. The presence of these lithocaps has important genetic implications: They require involvement of magmatic vapor and not solely hypersaline brine in IOA genesis; imply formation of the massive magnetite bodies at paleodepths of less than approximately 4 km; and render it unlikely that IOA deposits transition upward to either iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) deposits or pegmatitic breccias and veins. There are also important exploration implications: IOA deposits elsewhere in the iron belt could be concealed beneath lithocaps, which themselves could contain elements of economic value.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sillitoe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f25bfa21ec5bbf0787ahttps://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.5230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ORIGIN OF VOLCANIC-HOSTED MAGNETITE AT THE LAGUNA DEL MAULE COMPLEX, CHILE: A NEW EXAMPLE OF ANDEAN IRON OXIDE-APATITE MINERALIZATION2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Formation of iron oxide-apatite deposits triggered by magmatic assimilation of evaporitic sulfate2026
  3. 3Evidence of IOA-IOCG transition ore systems in the Tarom-Hashtjin metallogenic province, NW Iran2024
  4. 4Sodic-calcic alteration and transpressional shear along the Atacama fault system during IOCG mineralization, Copiapó, Chile2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Iron–Titanium Oxide–Apatite–Sulfide–Sulfate Microinclusions in Gabbro and Adakite from the Russian Far East Indicate Possible Magmatic Links to Iron Oxide–Apatite and Iron Oxide–Copper–Gold Deposits2024 · 2 citations