Key result
BACT-URIE score predicts infective endocarditis with ~0.93 AUROC, showing higher sensitivity than VIRSTA and PREDICT.
Why the study?
Existing risk scores for infective endocarditis in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia do not include S. aureus bacteriuria, a potential marker of hematogenous spread.
Does the BACT-URIE score improve the prediction of infective endocarditis in adult patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?
Cohort (n=389)
No
Does the BACT-URIE score improve the prediction of infective endocarditis in adult patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.91 and 0.93
The BACT-URIE score, which integrates S. aureus bacteriuria, demonstrates high predictive performance for infective endocarditis in patients with S. aureus bacteremia and may help optimize echocardiography utilization.
Background Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious complication of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Systematic echocardiographic evaluation, especially when including TEE, is resource-intensive. Existing risk scores do not include S. aureus bacteriuria, a potential marker of hematogenous spread. We assessed whether bacteriuria improves IE risk stratification. Methods We retrospectively analyzed two temporally distinct cohorts of adult SAB patients in a French tertiary hospital: a derivation cohort (2012–2019, n=233) and a validation cohort (2020–2023, n=156). Patients with proven urinary tract infection were excluded. Logistic regression identified predictors of IE, which were converted into weighted points to develop two scores: Day 1 (baseline variables) and Day 4 (including persistent bacteremia ≥72 h). Performance was compared with VIRSTA and PREDICT. Results IE occurred in 14.6% of the derivation cohort and 14.7% of the validation cohort. Independent predictors were intracardiac devices, community acquisition, bacteriuria, septic emboli, and persistent bacteremia. AUROCs for the Day 1 and Day 4 scores were 0.78 and 0.81 in derivation, and 0.91 and 0.93 in validation. At thresholds of >2 and >3, sensitivities were 67.65% and 70.59%, with NPVs of 93.29% and 93.83%, respectively. Compared with VIRSTA and PREDICT, BACT-URIE showed higher sensitivity in this cohort. Conclusion BACT-URIE is an exploratory score incorporating S. aureus bacteriuria to predict IE in SAB. Prospective multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ponfilly et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (n=389). BACT-URIE score vs. VIRSTA and PREDICT scores was evaluated on Infective endocarditis (AUROC 0.91 and 0.93). The BACT-URIE score incorporating S. aureus bacteriuria predicted infective endocarditis with AUROCs of 0.91 and 0.93 in the validation cohort, showing higher sensitivity than VIRSTA and PREDICT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: