Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study compares double cerclage wiring and tension band wiring for olecranon fractures, suggesting improved outcomes.
Several methods of surgically treating displaced, ulno-humerally stable olecranon fractures (Mayo type 2a and 2b) have been suggested. Cerclage wires have been used for at least a century to achieve fracture fixation but have been replaced by tension band wiring or plate fixation as the commonly recognized “gold standard” treatments. Thin soft tissues and migrating K-wires result in high complication rates following these 2 methods. We suggest double cerclage wiring as an alternative method that allows for the omission of K-wires. The method can be used for the same indications as tension band wiring: Mayo type 2a and 2b fractures. Two cerclages are placed, in figure-of-eight and figure-of-zero configurations, respectively, through separate drill holes distally and through the triceps tendon proximally. In a retrospective study, the reoperation rate and complication rate were twice as high following tension band wiring compared with double cerclage wiring (27% vs. 13% and 45% vs. 18%, respectively). An ongoing RCT will provide more robust evidence, but current studies indicate that double cerclage wiring is a safe and possibly superior alternative to tension band wiring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voigt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: