PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

No Male Tailors or Gym Trainers for Female in UP: A Step towards Women's Safety or Regressive Patriarchy?

PRPragya Ranjan

Key Points

  • The commentary critiques the 2024 UP Women's Commission proposal to limit male service providers for women, aiming to expose the underlying patriarchal implications.
  • Analysis of the UP Women's Commission proposal and its historical context.
  • Evaluation of gender roles and safety measures implemented in society.
  • Discussion on the socio-cultural implications of restricting male service providers.
  • The proposal is argued to not enhance women's safety but reinforce traditional gender roles.
  • Critique highlights the failure to address actual safety concerns in a meaningful way.

Abstract

The article is commentary on the proposal by the UP Women's Commission in 2024 to prohibit male trainers, barbers, and tailors from serving female clients. It aims to deconstruct how the measure proposed doesn't address women's safety issue but rather perpetrates the traditional patriarchal structure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pragya Ranjan (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07d65https://doi.org/10.17613/3p74f-pzg68
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper