Commentary explores harm reduction vs. mandated treatment in the legal system, highlighting ethical implications.
In "Mandated Drug Treatment in the Criminal Legal System-a Blunt but Necessary Tool?," in this issue of the Hastings Center Report, Brendan Saloner examines the empirical evidence surrounding mandated treatment, weighs pragmatic ethical arguments for and social justice arguments against the practice, and ultimately supplies a qualified defense of it. This commentary augments Saloner's egalitarian social justice perspective by outlining the legal principles of the police power and the parens patriae power, then uses this framework to illustrate the legal and ethical risks of mandated and involuntary treatment, and finally responds to Saloner's call for an affirmative vision of a more proportionate response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elliott J. Liebling (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: