Key result
IV ARG-007 shows no increase in adverse events versus placebo during acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 in acute ischaemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.
Does a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 improve safety and reduce infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
RCT (n=93)
double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 improve safety and reduce infarct volume in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Effect estimate: RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.15)
p-value: p=0.72
In patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 was safe and well tolerated but did not significantly reduce infarct volume at 48 hours.
Safe as EVT adjunct in LVO-AIS; extends preclinical neuroprotection to first RCT while leaving Phase 3 efficacy open.[[1]](https://www.bioworld.com/articles/725684-argenicas-stroke-drug-shows-positive-trends-in-functional-outcomes)[[2]](https://www.perroninstitute.
Background and aims The Phase II SEANCON study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of a single intravenous dose of ARG-007 (a cationic poly-arginine peptide with cerebroprotective effects in preclinical models) in patients with AIS undergoing revascularisation by endovascular thrombectomy. Methods SEANCON was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 10 Australian stroke centres. Large vessel occlusion AIS patients, eligible for endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of symptom onset, were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to ARG-007 or placebo. Enrolment criteria included baseline NIHSS > 5 and prestroke mRS 0–3, site-assessed ASPECTS 0–5 were excluded. All participants received standard-of-care thrombectomy with/without intravenous thrombolysis. The primary outcomes were measures of safety. The secondary outcome was infarct volume at 48 hours. Results 93 participants were randomized (ARG-007 n = 46; placebo n = 47). Follow-up to day 90 was completed by 77 (83%) participants; 16 (17%) participants died before day 90. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in treatment-emergent adverse events (risk ratio [RR]:1.02, 95% CI: 0.91-1.15; P = 0.72), mortality at day 90 (RR:1.70, 0.67-4.30, P = 0.26), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR:4.09, 0.47-35.2, P = 0.20), worsening of the index stroke (RR:2.04, 0.76-5.52, P = 0.16), or functional independence at day 90 (mRS 0-2: odds ratio 0.92, 0.36-2.37, P = 0.86). Infarct volume at 48 hours did not differ significantly between groups (ratio (adjusted): 1.65, 0.97–2.81, P = 0.065). A potential subgroup signal favoring ARG-007 was observed in participants with poor collateral circulation. Conclusions In AIS patients, ARG-007 was safe and well tolerated. Conflict of interest David Blacker: Shareholder in Argenica Therapeutics Ltd and is paid a consultancy fee as Chair of the Argenica Clinical Advisory Committee. All other authors have nothing to disclose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hankey et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=93). ARG-007 vs. placebo was evaluated on treatment-emergent adverse events (measures of safety) (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91-1.15, p=0.72). A single intravenous dose of ARG-007 was safe and well tolerated in acute ischaemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy, with no significant difference in treatment-emergent adverse events (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.91-1.15; P=0.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: