This article analyses Qatar’s mediation during the November 2023 Israel–Hamas hostage negotiations, which secured a temporary ceasefire and the exchange of hostages for Palestinian prisoners. Applying Saadia Touval’s framework, the study argues that Qatar’s involvement was a calculated act of statecraft aimed at advancing its political goals. The analysis demonstrates that Qatar’s diplomatic decisions were driven by three intersecting imperatives: maintaining domestic legitimacy, reinforcing its regional indispensability and protecting its vital partnership with the United States. Using a single case study design, the research traces how these objectives guided Qatar’s crisis diplomacy, from agenda-setting to designing verification mechanisms. These findings contribute to the mediation theory by highlighting the linkage between a mediator’s political motivations and their tactical choices, providing the first systematic analysis of Qatar’s multifaceted role in this high-pressure conflict.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Amira Schiff
Bar-Ilan University
Ariel Admoni
Bar-Ilan University
Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs
Bar-Ilan University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schiff et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fb8bfa21ec5bbf084f5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970261444188
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: