Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 8, 2026Open Access

After Access: Why Data Sovereignty Fails Without Usage Control

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ASAdeel Salman

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Demonstrates how post-access governance is essential for sustaining data sovereignty and control.

Key Points

  • The aim is to expose gaps in current data governance frameworks regarding post-access control and data sovereignty.
  • Analysis of data governance frameworks including IDSA architecture and various privacy laws
  • Development of a sovereignty model with four layers: policy expression, enforcement, provenance, and observability
  • Case study of Clearview AI to illustrate loss of control in data governance
  • Current frameworks fail to enforce enduring control once data is disclosed, limiting true sovereignty.
  • The implementation of post-access governance measures is crucial for maintaining sovereignty, particularly in AI systems.
  • The paper introduces a Sovereign Usage Control Audit and a procurement checklist for managing sensitive data.

Cite This Study

Adeel Salman (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fcdbfa21ec5bbf086f0https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20047573
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Credible Sovereignty: Operationalizing AI Governance Across Infrastructure, Data, and Models: A Systematic Review2026
  2. 2Compute Sovereignty: Why Renting Foreign GPUs Is Not AI Independence2026
  3. 3Data Sovereignty in the AI Era: Structural Guarantees Through Federated Pipeline Networks2026
  4. 4Sovereign AI - Privacy-Preserving Approaches for Managing Sensitive Public Data in Europe2026
  5. 5From Principles to Practice: Māori Data Sovereignty at the Point of AI System Design2026