ObjectiveThis work establishes a methodological framework for sources of pilot distraction and interruptions in a structured model that can be used as a tool for cockpit design/procedure assessment.BackgroundPilots must complete complex tasks, and distractions can impair performance and lead to errors that can cause aircraft accidents. Although various cockpit distractors are examined individually, there is no integrated approach.MethodDistraction and interruption sources were identified through a literature review and confirmed/extended by interviews with airline pilots. Associated weights were determined through pairwise comparisons, yielding a hierarchical model using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.Results26 sources of pilot distraction and interruptions were quantified and categorized into four categories: communication, head-down time, responding to abnormal conditions & unexpected situations, and searching for traffic.ConclusionA taxonomic structure for assessment is achieved with the top 5 sources identified as communications, technical interruptions, experience in type, environmental factors, operational irregularities, and airspace high terrain, accounting for 63.07%.ApplicationThe structured system is a flexible assessment scale that provides a taxonomic framework for airline risk management, supports future research, and cockpit design efforts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Üçler et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7fcdbfa21ec5bbf08730 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261449580
Çağlar Üçler
Özyeğin University
Mehmet Onur Balkan
Özyeğin University
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Özyeğin University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: