Randomized trial demonstrates larger infarct volume in patients with incomplete reperfusion, indicating the potential of FDCT for better assessment.
Background and aims Distal occlusion tracker (DOT) signs on immediate post-interventional flat-panel detector CT (FDCT) may help identify residual vessel occlusions and reduce overestimation of reperfusion after endovascular therapy (EVT). We investigated the association between FDCT-augmented reperfusion grading and tissue imaging outcomes after EVT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed EVT-treated patients achieving expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) ≥2b who had post-MT FDCT and follow-up MRI. The DOT sign was defined as punctiform or tubular hyperdensities on FDCT. Final infarct volume (FIV) was manually segmented on follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging. Reperfusion status was categorized as incomplete (eTICI 2b) or near-complete (eTICI 2c/3) based on either FDCT-augmented TICI, assessed by a core laboratory, or operator-graded TICI. Results Among 176 patients, 61 (34.7%) had incomplete and 115 (65.3%) had near-complete reperfusion according to FDCT-augmented TICI. Of cases classified as near-complete by operator-graded TICI, 13 were reclassified as incomplete on FDCT-augmented TICI; conversely, three cases deemed incomplete by operators were assessed as near-complete with FDCT-augmented TICI. Incomplete reperfusion was significantly associated with larger FIV compared with near-complete reperfusion (39.8 vs. 14.9 mL; β=32.4 mL, 95% CI 9.8–55.0). Incomplete reperfusion defined by FDCT-augmented TICI showed a directionally stronger association with FIV compared with operator-graded TICI (β=22.8 mL, 95% CI −1.9–47.4), although the bootstrap-estimated difference in coefficients was not statistically significant (Δβ=49.3 mL, 95% CI −14.5–114.3; P=0.16). Conclusions Incomplete reperfusion assessed by FDCT-augmented TICI was associated with larger infarct volumes compared with near-complete reperfusion, suggesting that adjunctive FDCT may improve tissue-level assessment after EVT. Conflict of interest All of authors. nothing to disclose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koge et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: