PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1996Applied and Environmental Microbiology2,928 citationsOpen Access

DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition

JZJizhong ZhouMBMary Ann BrunsJTJ.M. Tiedje

Key Points

  • To develop a rapid method for extracting DNA from soils while minimizing template DNA shearing during PCR.
  • Developed a high-salt extraction method utilizing NaCl and SDS for bacterial lysis.
  • Tested on eight soil types differing in organic carbon, clay content, and pH.
  • Conducted DNA recovery trials on soils seeded with gram-negative bacteria and subsequent varying soil samples.
  • Achieved DNA recovery rates of 92 to 99% in seeded soils.
  • Observed crude DNA yields ranging from 2.5 to 26.9 micrograms of DNA g-1 across the eight soils.
  • Established a positive correlation (r = 0.73) between soil organic carbon content and DNA yield.

Abstract

A simple, rapid method for bacterial lysis and direct extraction of DNA from soils with minimal shearing was developed to address the risk of chimera formation from small template DNA during subsequent PCR. The method was based on lysis with a high-salt extraction buffer (1.5 M NaCl) and extended heating (2 to 3 h) of the soil suspension in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, and proteinase K. The extraction method required 6 h and was tested on eight soils differing in organic carbon, clay content, and pH, including ones from which DNA extraction is difficult. The DNA fragment size in crude extracts from all soils was > 23 kb. Preliminary trials indicated that DNA recovery from two soils seeded with gram-negative bacteria was 92 to 99%. When the method was tested on all eight unseeded soils, microscopic examination of indigenous bacteria in soil pellets before and after extraction showed variable cell lysis efficiency (26 to 92%). Crude DNA yields from the eight soils ranged from 2.5 to 26.9 micrograms of DNA g-1, and these were positively correlated with the organic carbon content in the soil (r = 0.73). DNA yields from gram-positive bacteria from pure cultures were two to six times higher when the high-salt-SDS-heat method was combined with mortar-and-pestle grinding and freeze-thawing, and most DNA recovered was of high molecular weight. Four methods for purifying crude DNA were also evaluated for percent recovery, fragment size, speed, enzyme restriction, PCR amplification, and DNA-DNA hybridization. In general, all methods produced DNA pure enough for PCR amplification. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics will influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods on the basis of experimental goals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fe19377467cb4cde272acfhttps://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.2.316-322.1996
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1DNA Probe Method for the Detection of Specific Microorganisms in the Soil Bacterial Community1988 · 584 citations
  2. 2Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction1992 · 573 citations
  3. 3Phylogenetic Analyses of a New Group of Denitrifiers Capable of Anaerobic Growth on Toluene and Description of Azoarcus tolulyticus sp. nov.1995 · 232 citations
  4. 4Particle Fractionation and Particle‐Size Analysis1965 · 3,039 citations
  5. 5Use of Monodispersed, Fluorescently Labeled Bacteria to Estimate In Situ Protozoan Bacterivory1987 · 585 citations