OBJECTIVE: To improve assessment of the DSM-IV alcohol tolerance criterion in adolescents, this study tested the performance of a minimum percentage increase in drinking quantity, and a proxy measure of tolerance (i.e., average heavy-drinking quantity per occasion) in identifying adolescents with alcohol dependence. METHOD: Two adolescent samples were examined. In one sample (N = 415, 58% male, 79% white, 57% clinical), a modified version of the SCID was used to determine DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses, and lifetime drinking history data were collected by interview. In the second sample (N = 470, 60% male, 76% white, 100% clinical), the Adolescent Diagnostic Interview was used to determine DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses and to collect data on initial- and current-drinking quantities needed to become intoxicated. The performance of a percentage increase and average heavy-drinking quantity in identifying those with dependence was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The utility of a percentage increase definition was limited by the high degree of variability in initial-drinking quantities. Percentage increase may underassign the tolerance symptom when initial-drinking quantities are high and overassign the symptom when initial-drinking quantities are low. Average heavy-drinking quantity per occasion, combined with a minimum frequency of drinking, demonstrated better performance than any percentage increase definition. CONCLUSIONS: Alternatives to a change-based (e.g., percentage increase) definition of tolerance warrant study due to limits of change-based definitions when initial-drinking quantity shows a high degree of variability. The variability in initial-drinking quantity may reflect individual differences in initial sensitivity that need to be considered in tolerance assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2001) studied this question.