PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 31, 2014Journal of Investigative Surgery35 citations

Hemostatic Efficacy of EVARREST™, Fibrin Sealant Patch vs. TachoSil® in a Heparinized Swine Spleen Incision Model

View Full Paper
JMJohn P. MatonickRutgers, The State University of New JerseyJHJeffrey HammondPfizer (United States)

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-generation single-component hemostats such as oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), fibrin, collagen, and gelatin have evolved into second and third generations of combination hemostats. OBJECTIVE: This study compares two FDA approved products, EVARREST™, Fibrin Sealant Patch, a hemostat comprised of a matrix of nonwoven polyglactin 910 embedded in ORC coated with human fibrinogen and thrombin to TachoSil® medicated sponge, an equine collagen pad coated with human fibrinogen and thrombin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Swine were anticoagulated with heparin to 3X their baseline activated clotting time and a 15 mm long × 3 mm deep incision was made to create a consistent moderate bleeding pattern. Test material was then applied to the wound site and compressed manually for 3 min with just enough pressure to prevent continued bleeding. Hemostatic effectiveness was evaluated at 3 min and 10 min. RESULTS: At 3 min, the hemostasis success rate was 86% in the EVARREST™ group and 0% in the TachoSil® group, p < .0001. The overall success rate at 10 min was 100% with EVARREST™ and 4% with TachoSil®, p < .0001. Adhesive failure, in which the test material did not stick to the tissue, occurred in 96% of TachoSil® sites. In contrast, 100% of the EVARREST™ applications adhered to the test site. CONCLUSIONS: EVARREST™, Fibrin Sealant Patch demonstrated greater wound adhesion and more effective hemostasis than TachoSil®. Adhesive failure was the primary failure mode for TachoSil® in this model.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matonick et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fe45255854fc4508553ed2https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2014.941444
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper