Why the study?
Adoption of high-sensitivity troponin assays by hospitals worldwide is increasing, but the effects of a simultaneous state-wide implementation on the health service needed to be determined.
Does the implementation of a high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) assay reduce hospital length of stay in adult patients presenting to the ED requiring troponin testing?
Does the implementation of a high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) assay reduce hospital length of stay in adult patients presenting to the ED requiring troponin testing?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The state-wide implementation of high-sensitivity troponin assays significantly reduced hospital length of stay and associated costs without increasing downstream invasive procedures or ward admissions.
Adoption of High-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) assays by hospitals worldwide is increasing. We sought to determine the effects of a simultaneous state-wide hs-cTn assay introduction on the implementing health service. A quasi-experimental pre-post design was used. Participants included all adult patients presenting to 21 Australian hospitals who had troponin testing commenced within the Emergency Department (ED). Data were collected for 124,357 episodes of care between 30 April 2018 and 23 April 2019; six months pre- and six months post-implementation of the assay. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included ED LOS, 90-day cardiovascular mortality, elevated troponin, diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), admission to a cardiology ward, invasive cardiac procedures, and total hospital costs. Following hs-cTn implementation, there was a 1.9-h (95% CI: -2.9 to -1.0 h) reduction in overall LOS. This equated to a cost saving of over 9 million Australian dollars per year. There was no increase in diagnosis of AMI, invasive cardiac procedures or ward admissions. The use of hs-cTn assays facilitates important benefits for health services by enabling more rapid evaluation protocols within the ED. This benefit may be considerable given the large cohort of emergency patients with possible ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenslade et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: