Key result
Contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MR coronary angiography detects significant CAD with ~94% sensitivity.
Why the study?
The accuracy of previously published MR coronary angiography protocols varies widely and there are no clinical data on contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MR coronary angiography using T1-shortening contrast agents.
Does contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MR coronary angiography accurately detect coronary artery stenosis compared to X-ray angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Does contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MR coronary angiography accurately detect coronary artery stenosis compared to X-ray angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MR coronary angiography provides high sensitivity but moderate specificity for detecting proximal and mid-coronary artery stenoses.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) technique for detection of coronary artery stenoses. BACKGROUND: The accuracy of previously published MR coronary angiography protocols varies widely. Recently, coronary artery imaging using T1-shortening contrast agent has become possible, but so far there are no data concerning its clinical application. METHODS: Magnetic resonance coronary angiography was performed in 50 patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Magnetic resonance data acquisition using an ultrafast 3D gradient-echo sequence lasted over 32 heartbeats within one single breath-hold. Twenty milliliters of gadopentetate dimeglumine was injected at a flow rate of 1 ml/s for two successive studies covering the main coronary arteries in single-oblique planes. Stenosis assessment by MR was compared with significant (diameter stenosis > 50%) stenoses on X-ray angiography. Evaluation was limited to the proximal and mid-coronary artery segments. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight of 350 artery segments (76.6%) could be evaluated. Left circumflex coronary artery was only evaluable in 50% of cases by MR. In the evaluable segments, 48 of 56 stenoses and 193 of 212 nonstenotic segments were correctly classified by MR. On a patient basis, MR correctly identified 34 of 36 patients with and 8 of 14 patients without significant coronary stenoses as demonstrated by X-ray angiography (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 57.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Oblique projection contrast-enhanced MR coronary angiograms obtained within one single breath-hold permit identification of patients with coronary stenoses in the proximal and mid segments of the major coronary arteries with satisfactory accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regenfus et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=50). Contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography vs. X-ray angiography was evaluated on Detection of significant coronary artery stenoses (>50% diameter stenosis) on a patient basis (Sensitivity 94.4%, Specificity 57.1%). Contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MR coronary angiography identified patients with significant coronary stenoses with 94.4% sensitivity and 57.1% specificity compared to X-ray angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: