Key result
16-row MSCT coronary angiography detects significant coronary stenoses with ~95% sensitivity versus invasive angiography.
Why the study?
The diagnostic value of the latest 16-row MSCT coronary angiography compared to invasive coronary angiography for detecting significant stenoses was evaluated.
Does 16-row MSCT coronary angiography accurately detect significant coronary stenoses compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients with stable angina or atypical chest pain?
Cross-Sectional (n=51)
Blinded observers
Does 16-row MSCT coronary angiography accurately detect significant coronary stenoses compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients with stable angina or atypical chest pain?
16-row MSCT coronary angiography demonstrates high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (98%) for detecting significant coronary stenoses compared to invasive angiography.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the diagnostic value of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography (CA) to detect significant stenoses (> or =50% lumen diameter reduction) with that of invasive CA. BACKGROUND: The latest 16-row MSCT scanner has a faster rotation time (375 ms) and permits scanning with a higher X-ray tube current (500 to 600 mA) during MSCT CA when compared with previous scanners. METHODS: We studied 51 patients (37 men, mean age 58.9 +/- 10.0 years) with stable angina or atypical chest pain. Patients with pre-scan heart rates > or =70 beats/min received oral beta-blockade. The heart was scanned after intravenous injection of 100 ml contrast (iodine content, 400 mg/ml). Mean scan time was 18.9 +/- 1.0 s. The MSCT scans were analyzed by two observers unaware of the results of invasive angiography, and all available coronary branches > or =2 mm were included. RESULTS: Invasive CA demonstrated normal arteries in 16% (8 of 51), non-significant disease in 21% (11 of 51), single-vessel disease in 37% (19 of 51), and multi-vessel disease in 26% (13 of 51) of patients. There were 64 significant lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detection of significant lesions on a segment-based analysis were 95% (61 of 64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 86 to 99), 98% (537 of 546, 95% CI 96 to 99), 87% (61 of 70, 95% CI 76 to 98), and 99% (537 of 540, 95% CI 98 to 99), respectively. All patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries or significant lesions were correctly identified. Three of 11 patients with <50% lesions were incorrectly classified as having single-vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: The 16-row MSCT CA reliably detects significant coronary stenoses in patients with atypical chest pain or stable angina pectoris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mollet et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Stable angina or atypical chest pain (n=51). 16-row multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography vs. Invasive coronary angiography was evaluated on Detection of significant stenoses (≥50% lumen diameter reduction). 16-row MSCT coronary angiography detected significant coronary stenoses with 95% sensitivity (95% CI 86-99) and 98% specificity (95% CI 96-99) compared to invasive angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: