Why the study?
Does a high coronary artery calcium score predict cardiac mortality and coronary artery disease in high-risk Japanese patients?
Does a high coronary artery calcium score predict cardiac mortality and coronary artery disease in high-risk Japanese patients?
A coronary artery calcium score >1,000 strongly predicts angiographic coronary artery disease and long-term cardiac mortality in high-risk Japanese patients, extending prognostic evidence to Asian populations.
May inform CAC-based risk stratification in high-risk Japanese patients; extends prognostic data to Asian cohorts but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Although the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score as measured with computed tomography (CT) is associated with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in Western countries, little is known in Asian populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and seventeen Japanese patients (205 men and 112 women) were followed in the study and they underwent both coronary angiography and CT for CAC measurements. The frequencies of angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) were 5%, 36%, 76%, 80%, and 94% (P<0.001) and the needs for revascularization were 5%, 26%, 53%, 59%, and 69% (P<0.001) in patients with CAC scores of 0 (n=64), 1-100 (n=58), 101-400 (n=76), 401-1,000 (n=70), and >1,000 (n=49), respectively. In the average of 6.0 (range, 1-10) years follow-up period, 34 patients died including 13 from reasons of cardiac disease. In a Cox proportional hazard model after adjustment for age and sex, traditional coronary risk factors, previous myocardial infarction, and the need for revascularization, the hazard ratio for cardiac mortality in patients with a CAC score >1,000 was 2.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.15-9.40) compared with those with a CAC score=0-100. CONCLUSIONS: The CAC score has a predictive value for angiographical CAD and long-term mortality from cardiac disease in Japanese high-risk patients who undergo coronary angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamamoto et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: