This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Thermoelectric power generation from the prototype π-shaped module composed of p-type colusite (Cu26Cr2Ge6S32) and n-type nanostructured PbTe (Pb0.98Ga0.02Te-3% GeTe) was demonstrated in this study. The thermoelectric figure of merit zT of Cu26Cr2Ge6S32 and Pb0.98Ga0.02Te-3% GeTe was ∼0.8 and ∼1.2 at 665 K, respectively. In PbTe, transmission electron microscopic images and energy-dispersive x-ray elemental maps reveal the insertion of nanoscale precipitates induced by the GeTe alloying. Contact layers based on Au and Co-Fe were used for p- and n-type thermoelectric legs, respectively, which allow the low electrical specific contact resistances of ≤10 × 10−10 Ω m2 at room temperature. Maximum thermoelectric conversion efficiency ηmax of ∼5.5% was obtained for the Cu26Cr2Ge6S32 and Pb0.98Ga0.02Te-3% GeTe-based two-pair module when the hot-side Th and cold-side Tc temperatures were maintained at 673 and 283 K, respectively. A three-dimensional finite-element simulation predicts the ηmax of ∼7.1% for the module at Th and Tc of 673 and 283 K, respectively.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetty et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: