Why the study?
Do SMN-restoring therapies improve electrophysiological biomarkers (CMAP, MUNE) in an SMA mouse model?
Do SMN-restoring therapies improve electrophysiological biomarkers (CMAP, MUNE) in an SMA mouse model?
SMN-restoring therapies preserve MUNE and gradually repair CMAP responses in an SMA mouse model, providing preclinical evidence for their use as biomarkers in clinical trials.
Does not support clinical adoption; hypothesis-generating for MUNE/CMAP as SMA biomarkers.
OBJECTIVE: Preclinical therapies that restore survival motor neuron (SMN) protein levels can dramatically extend survival in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) mouse models. Biomarkers are needed to effectively translate these promising therapies to clinical trials. Our objective was to investigate electrophysiological biomarkers of compound muscle action potential (CMAP), motor unit number estimation (MUNE) and electromyography (EMG) using an SMA mouse model. METHODS: ). To investigate these measures as biomarkers of treatment response, measurements were obtained in SMNΔ7 mice treated with antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) or gene therapy. RESULTS: mice. MUNE in ASO-treated SMNΔ7 mice were similar to controls at day 12 and 30. CMAP reduction persisted in ASO-treated SMNΔ7 mice at day 12 but was corrected at day 30. Similarly, CMAP and MUNE responses were corrected with gene therapy to restore SMN. INTERPRETATION: These studies confirm features of preserved neuromuscular function in the early postnatal period and subsequent motor unit loss in SMNΔ7 mice. SMN restoring therapies result in preserved MUNE and gradual repair of CMAP responses. This provides preclinical evidence for the utilization of CMAP and MUNE as biomarkers in future SMA clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnold et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: