This article argues for hesychasm's role in understanding divine experience in a theological context, suggesting a new model for religious experience.
This article argues that hesychasm, as articulated by Gregory Palamas, constitutes a genuine locus theologicus when ‘experience’ is construed within a disciplined epistemological and ecclesial framework. Against both rationalist reductions of theology to discursive inference and subjectivist appeals to immediate experience, Gregory Palamas develops a participatory epistemology in which knowledge of God is grounded in communion rather than representation. The study demonstrates that the essence–energies distinction functions not merely as a metaphysical thesis but as an epistemological grammar that renders real, non-exhaustive knowledge of God possible while preserving apophatic restraint. Through a close hermeneutical analysis of Palamas’ Greek texts – situated within the broader patristic tradition and critically engaged with recent debates in theological epistemology – the article shows that Palamas’ conception of experience is neither autonomous nor optional. It is ecclesially mediated, normed by ascetical discernment, and oriented towards deification.Contribution: By reframing hesychasm as a locus theologicus, the current study contributes to contemporary discussions on religious experience, participatory realism and theological method. Thus, it proposes a model in which lived communion and doctrinal rigour prove mutually constitutive, not opposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wojciech Słomski (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: