PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Ecological Indicators0 citationsOpen Access

Integrating environmental drivers and forest structure for regional prediction of aboveground carbon storage in Moso bamboo forests

View Full Paper
XZXiao ZhouState Forestry and Grassland AdministrationYWYueting WangState Forestry and Grassland AdministrationRSRam P. SharmaTribhuvan University

Key Points

  • This research aims to clarify the relationship between forest structure and environmental factors on aboveground carbon storage in Moso bamboo forests.
  • Analyzed data from 532 plots across eight provinces in southern China.
  • Utilized four machine learning algorithms: random forest, boosted regression trees, artificial neural networks, and support vector machines.
  • Applied structural equation modeling to identify direct and indirect relationships influencing carbon storage.
  • Random forest model achieved high predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.858, rRMSE = 18.256%).
  • Identified basal area and carbon content coefficient as crucial predictors of aboveground carbon storage.
  • Topography and climatic variables mainly influenced carbon storage indirectly through structural attributes.

Abstract

Moso bamboo ( Phyllostachys pubescens ) forests are important components of global forest ecosystems and play a key role in regional carbon cycling. Understanding the ecological mechanisms underlying stand aboveground carbon storage (ACS) is essential for improving carbon assessment. However, the roles of stand structure and its mediating effects between environmental factors and carbon storage remain insufficiently clarified. In this study, data from 532 plots across eight provinces in southern China, including Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Fujian, Sichuan, Guangxi, Hunan, and Hubei, were analyzed. Four machine learning algorithms, namely random forest (RF), boosted regression trees (BRT), artificial neural networks (ANN), and support vector machines (SVM), were applied to quantify the effects of stand, soil, climate, and topography variables on ACS. Structural equation modeling was further used to disentangle direct and indirect pathways. The results show that ACS is primarily regulated by stand structural attributes, with basal area (BA) as the dominant predictor and carbon content coefficient (CCC) as a secondary factor. However, rather than acting as an independent driver, the influence of stand structure emerges as a key mediating pathway through which topography and climatic variables, such as elevation and Hargreaves reference evaporation (Eref), indirectly shape carbon accumulation. This reveals that carbon storage is governed by a coupled system in which structural development and environmental conditions jointly determine ACS formation. Some soil and climatic variables exhibited method dependent importance, suggesting context-specific effects under environmental heterogeneity. Among the machine learning models, RF achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.858, rRMSE = 18.256%), effectively capturing nonlinear relationships and interactions, followed by BRT, while SVM and ANN showed comparatively lower performance. When stand structural variables were combined with environmental factors, RF and BRT consistently outperformed the other models. Overall, these findings move beyond the conventional emphasis on dominant predictors by demonstrating that the role of stand structure is context-dependent and mediated by environmental conditions. This study highlights the ecological importance of structure–environment coupling mechanisms and supports the application of ensemble machine learning approaches for robust regional-scale estimation of ACS. • Integrated ML and SEM to identify direct and indirect drivers of ACS. • Identified BA and carbon content coefficient as dominant predictors of ACS. • Topography and climatic factors affected ACS mainly indirectly via BA. • Random forest achieved high accuracy (R 2 = 0.858; rRMSE =18.256%). • SHAP used to interpret the optimal model and quantify feature importance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fece83b9154b0b82875f57https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114945
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper