PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Neural Engineering1 citationsOpen Access

Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

View Full Paper
NPNatalie Phelps PhelpsRKRodolfo KeeseyRHRachel Hawthorn

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation affects leg muscle recruitment and clarify whether responses are due to central network engagement or local activation.
  • Investigated cervical tSCS effects in 12 unimpaired participants.
  • Compared different electrode configurations: iliac crests vs. clavicles.
  • Utilized lumbar tSCS as a control for evaluating leg muscle recruitment.
  • Leg muscle responses during cervical tSCS occurred mainly with electrodes over the iliac crests.
  • Cervical-iliac responses had shorter onset latencies and less post-activation depression vs. lumbar tSCS.
  • Leg muscle activation is driven by neural structures near the electrode sites rather than cervico-lumbar pathways.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is increasingly used as a neuromodulation technique to improve motor function after neuromotor disorders. Cervical tSCS has been reported to influence lumbar networks, leading to the hypothesis that leg muscle recruitment may occur via activation of long-range spinal connections between cervical and lumbar circuits. However, it remains unclear whether such responses reflect central network engagement or electrode-dependent local activation. APPROACH: We investigated the neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical tSCS in unimpaired participants (N = 12). We compared cervical tSCS electrode configurations in which the return electrodes were placed over the iliac crests versus over the clavicles. We used lumbar tSCS as a control for leg muscle recruitment via the posterior root-muscle reflex. RESULTS: Leg muscle responses during cervical tSCS were observed primarily when the return electrodes were placed over the iliac crests and were mostly absent when the anodes were placed over the clavicles. Compared to lumbar tSCS, cervical-iliac responses exhibited shorter onset latencies and minimal post-activation depression, consistent with direct efferent recruitment rather than afferent-mediated reflex activation. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that leg muscle activation during cervical-iliac tSCS originates from neural structures near the distal return electrodes rather than from long-range cervico-lumbar pathways. Return electrode placement therefore critically determines the origin of evoked responses during cervical stimulation and must be considered when interpreting cervical tSCS mechanisms and rehabilitative effects that extend caudally from the cervical spinal cord.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Phelps et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf16b9154b0b82876387https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ae697b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper