Key result
SGLT2i improved LVEF (MD 1.58, p=0.01) and reduced heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.78, p=0.023) in AMI patients, whereas GLP-1RA showed no significant benefits on major clinical endpoints.
Why the study?
The efficacy of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in acute myocardial infarction remains uncertain.
Do SGLT2i and GLP-1RA improve all-cause mortality and LVEF in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to placebo?
Meta-Analysis (n=11,944)
Do SGLT2i and GLP-1RA improve all-cause mortality and LVEF in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to placebo?
Effect estimate: MD 1.58
p-value: p=0.01
In patients with acute myocardial infarction, SGLT2 inhibitors improve LVEF and reduce heart failure hospitalizations but do not reduce all-cause mortality, while GLP-1RAs show no significant clinical benefits.
Reinforces SGLT2i as foundational therapy in HFrEF; confirms functional benefit across 11,311 patients with high certainty.[[1]](https://academic.oup.com/europace/article-pdf/27/Supplement_1/euaf085.236/63304323/euaf085.236.pdf)[[2]](https://www.researchgate.
Introduction: The efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA in patients with AMI Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to January 2025. The primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: Six RCTs assessed SGLT2i (SGLT2i: n=5,660; placebo: n=5,651) and five assessed GLP-1RA (GLP-1RA: n=300; placebo: n=333). Compared with placebo, SGLT2i improved LVEF (mean difference = 1.58, p = 0.01, high certainty) and reduced heart failure hospitalization (HHF) (odds ratio = 0.78, p = 0.023, moderate certainty) in AMI patients. No significant benefit was observed in all-cause mortality with SGLT2i, and no significant benefits of GLP-1RA were observed in all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction relapse, infarct size, LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, or left ventricular end-systolic volume. TSA indicated potential false positives for the LVEF and HHF findings with SGLT2i Discussion: Several limitations of the included studies include a small number of studies, heterogeneity in experimental design, and reliance on alternative endpoints. Conclusion: SGLT2i improved LVEF and reduced HHF in patients with AMI but did not significantly improve all-cause mortality. GLP-1RA did not significantly improve LVEF or major clinical endpoints. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to verify these results and provide more robust evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in acute myocardial infarction (n=11,944). SGLT2i and GLP-1RA vs. placebo was evaluated on all-cause mortality and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 1.58, p=0.01). SGLT2i improved LVEF (MD 1.58, p=0.01) and reduced heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.78, p=0.023) in AMI patients, whereas GLP-1RA showed no significant benefits on major clinical endpoints.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: