Identifies S100A9 modulation as a method to protect nasal epithelial cells and reduce inflammation in CRSwNP.
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) exhibits pronounced endotypic heterogeneity, with macrophages serving as key drivers of sustained mucosal inflammation. In this study, we identify S100A9 as a macrophage-derived alarmin that is markedly elevated in CRSwNP tissues. Integrative analyses of public bulk transcriptomic datasets and single-cell RNA-sequencing atlases demonstrated that S100A9 expression was predominantly enriched in macrophage clusters, where it showed strong co-expression with canonical M1-associated markers, while exhibiting limited expression in epithelial cell subsets. Spatial and correlation analyses further supported a close association between S100A9⁺ macrophages and epithelial barrier-related gene signatures. Functionally, shRNA-mediated silencing of S100A9 attenuated M1-like macrophage polarization, as evidenced by reduced expression of pro-inflammatory mediators and polarization markers, accompanied by a shift toward a less inflammatory macrophage phenotype. Conditioned media derived from S100A9-deficient macrophages significantly mitigated epithelial injury, leading to restoration of epithelial barrier integrity, as indicated by enhanced expression of tight junction proteins, including occludin and claudins. Importantly, S100A9 knockdown disrupted the pathogenic macrophage-epithelial inflammatory feedback loop, thereby dampening sustained inflammatory signaling and limiting epithelial barrier breakdown that perpetuates tissue damage in CRSwNP. Clinically, elevated S100A9 levels correlated with disease severity indices and effectively distinguished a macrophage-enriched inflammatory endotype of CRSwNP, highlighting S100A9 as both a mechanistic driver and a potential biomarker for disease stratification. Collectively, these findings position S100A9 as a mechanistic mediator and a promising therapeutic target for CRSwNP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: