PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 20260 citations

Comprehensive Dosimetric Analysis of Cone-Beam CT in radiotherapy: Evaluation of SSDE in Thorax and Pelvic Protocols with Optimization Recommendations

View Full Paper
MSMefrah SoukainaBIBouadel IkbalMKMorad El kafhali

Key Points

  • To analyze the dosimetric implications of cone beam CT protocols, focusing on SSDE to better reflect absorbed doses based on patient anatomy.
  • Retrospective collection of CBCT data from clinical procedures using standard thoracic and pelvic protocols.
  • Manual SSDE calculations across patients with varying anatomical sizes.
  • Analysis of dose variability in relation to patient dimensions.
  • Observed SSDE values for thoracic imaging varied significantly from 45.2 mGy to 271.46 mGy.
  • For pelvic imaging, SSDE values ranged from 229.31 mGy to 909.11 mGy.
  • Smaller patients received higher SSDE values due to reduced tissue volume and increased radiation concentration.

Abstract

Background : Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) to improve the accuracy of treatment, particularly in the thoracic and pelvic regions. However, repeated CBCT acquisitions raise concerns regarding cumulative radiation exposure, particularly to radiosensitive organs. Purpose : This study aims to provide a comprehensive dosimetric analysis of CBCT imaging protocols, focusing on size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) as a patient-centred metric that incorporates anatomical dimensions, such as anterior–posterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) diameters, to more accurately reflect absorbed doses. Methods : CBCT data were collected retrospectively from clinical procedures using standard thoracic and pelvic protocols. Manual calculations of SSDE were performed and compared across patients with different anatomical sizes. Dose variability was analysed in relation to patient dimensions. Results : Significant inter-patient variability was observed in SSDE values, ranging from 45.2 mGy to 271.46 mGy for thoracic imaging and from 229.31 mGy to 909.11 mGy for pelvic imaging. These corresponded to approximately 0.09–0.44% and 0.76–1.16% of the total prescribed therapeutic dose, respectively. Notably, smaller patients received disproportionately higher SSDE values, primarily due to reduced tissue volume and increased radiation concentration. Conclusion : The findings highlight the limitations of using fixed-dose metrics such as CTDIvol and emphasise the importance of incorporating SSDE into routine clinical practice. Personalised imaging protocols based on patient size are recommended to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, particularly for paediatric and small-sized patients, while maintaining adequate image quality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soukaina et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecf71b9154b0b82876738https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2026015/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper