Evaluates grant writing support's impact on faculty funding success, suggesting improvements in grant competitiveness.
Objectives/Goals: To evaluate the effectiveness of multiple grant writing support services – including workshops, one-on-one mentoring, and grant pre-review – in improving faculty success in securing research funding. Methods/Study Population: The study included junior faculty participating in the R Club Grant Program – a grant development program to assist junior faculty in the preparation of their first research grant proposal – within the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (UC COM) and the Center for Clinical & Translational Science & Training (CCTST), as well as UC COM faculty who engaged in one-on-one mentoring, workshops, or the Grant Pre-Review Program. Data on participation, satisfaction, and grant submission outcomes were collected and analyzed to assess the impact of each grant writing support service. Results/Anticipated Results: More than 100 investigators participated in R Club Grant Program workshops and received supplemental grant development materials. Comprehensive support – including workshops, mentoring, and pre-review – has contributed to successful funding across multiple NIH mechanisms (K23, R01, R03, R21, R35, and R56). Based on positive participant feedback, future expansion will include online and on-demand resources to enhance accessibility to grant writing webinars and training materials. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Comprehensive grant writing support improves faculty preparedness and funding success. Expanding to online and on-demand formats will broaden access, promote equity in research training, and strengthen institutional grant competitiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veevers et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: