PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026International Journal of Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of adjuvant therapy on resected invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a Korean nationwide study

View Full Paper
MCMunseok ChoiJJJin-Young JangIHIn Woong Han

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine the oncologic efficacy of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
  • Retrospective analysis of 539 patients with invasive pancreatic IPMN treated from 2005 to 2020.
  • Performed propensity score-matched survival analyses to evaluate adjuvant therapy outcomes.
  • Included multivariate analysis to identify prognostic factors affecting survival.
  • No significant differences in overall survival between surgery-alone and adjuvant therapy groups (P = 0.080).
  • In stage I, disease-free survival improved in the adjuvant therapy group (P = 0.020), not observed in other stages.
  • Perineural invasion and elevated CA 19-9 levels were identified as adverse prognostic factors.

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant therapy (AT) has demonstrated survival benefits in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the oncologic efficacy of AT in resected invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) remains unclear, and there are no established guidelines in this context. Method: We retrospectively analyzed 539 patients with invasive pancreatic IPMN treated between 2005 and 2020 across 18 centers in Korea. Propensity score-matched (PSM) and stage-matched survival analyses were performed. Results: A total of 354 patients were enrolled in a 1:1 PSM analysis. Multivariate analysis identified perineural invasion (HR, 2.589; 95% CI, 1.528–4.385; P 37 (HR, 2.032; 95% CI, 1.227–3.364; P < 0.001) as adverse prognostic factors for resected invasive IPMN. In the overall cohort, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the surgery-alone (SA) and AT groups ( P = 0.882; P = 0.080). Similarly, in the stage-matched analysis, no significant difference in OS was observed between the SA and AT groups (stage I, P = 0.621; stage II, P = 0.662; stage III, P = 0.571). While DFS was improved in the stage I group compared to the SA group ( P = 0.020), this benefit was not observed in other stages. Conclusions: Unlike in PDAC, AT was not associated with an OS benefit for resected invasive IPMN across stages I–III. While its efficacy in patients with poor prognostic factors remains uncertain, further prospective studies are warranted to clarify the role of AT in high-risk subsets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecfafb9154b0b82876b5chttps://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000005305
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper