PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Animal Science0 citations

Effect of Liquid Iron Supplementation via Milk Dosing System versus Intramuscular Injection on Post-weaning Growth and Hematological Parameters in Piglets

View Full Paper
LSLaia SobreviaAB Neo (Czechia)LBL. BlaviAB Neo (Czechia)FGFrancesc González-SoléAB Neo (Czechia)

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the effects of liquid iron supplementation via milk to intramuscular injection on growth and hematological parameters in piglets.
  • 1,241 DanBred × Pietrain piglets received either an IM iron injection or liquid iron supplement in milk for 18 days.
  • Piglets were monitored pre-weaning and at 13 and 41 days post-weaning for body weight, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and RBC counts.
  • All pigs were housed in 48 pens, stratified by sex, body weight, and iron treatment.
  • Piglets receiving liquid iron showed greater body weight by day 43 (PB = 19.27 kg; INJ = 18.31 kg; p < 0.001).
  • Mortality and culling rates were lower in the PB group (0.17% vs 0.74%; p = 0.026).
  • Hematological parameters equalized between groups by day 41, despite lower initial Ht and Hb in the PB group.

Abstract

Abstract Piglets are born with limited iron reserves and experience a physiological decline in hemoglobin (Hb) due to rapid postnatal growth and low iron content of sow’s milk. To prevent iron deficiency anemia, intramuscular (IM) iron injection is routinely administered within the first days postpartum. However, parenteral supplementation may increase infection risk, induce stress and require substantial labour. An alternative strategy is the automatic delivery of iron through a milk cup system, allowing piglets to self-regulate intake while reducing handling stress and labour demands. This study evaluated the effects of iron supplementation via complementary milk versus IM injection during lactation on post-weaning growth and hematological parameters. A total of 1,241 DanBred × Pietrain piglets received complementary milk (Pump’n’Grow, AB Neo, Spain). Half received an IM iron injection (INJ; 200 mg gleptoferron with 45 mg toltrazuril) one day after birth, while others received a liquid iron supplement (PB; Piglet Boozt, AB Neo, Spain) containing FeSO4, vitamin B12, zinc, organic acids, and salts, administered through the milk for 18 days (1,300 mg FeSO4/L milk). Piglets were weaned at 24 days of age (initial body weight (BW)= 6.63 ± 0.20 kg) and assigned to 48 pens (22–23 pigs/pen) according to sex, body weight, and prior iron treatment. All pigs were fed standard post-weaning diets containing 100 ppm Fe (days 0–14) and 80 ppm Fe (days 14–43). Forty-eight pigs were sampled two days pre-weaning and at days 13 and 41 post-weaning for analysis of hematocrit (Ht), Hb, and red blood cell (RBC) counts. Piglets supplemented with PB during lactation showed higher feed intake and growth during days 0–14, 14–28, and overall (0–43) post-weaning (p 0.05), resulting in greater BW (day 43: INJ = 18.31 kg; PB = 19.27 kg; p 0.001). The PB group also showed lower culling (INJ = 0.74%; PB = 0.17%; p = 0.026) and combined mortality plus culling rates (INJ = 1.25%; PB = 0.35%; p = 0.049) between days 28–43 and tended to have fewer diarrhoea days during the first two weeks post-weaning (INJ = 0.37; PB = 0.21; p = 0.059). Although PB piglets had lower pre-weaning Ht and Hb levels (p = 0.002), Ht values equalized by day 13, and PB pigs showed higher RBC counts (INJ = 5.7 × 106; PB = 6.6 × 106; p = 0.004). By day 41, hematological parameters were similar between treatments. In conclusion, liquid iron supplementation through a milk dosing system during lactation improved post-weaning growth performance and reduced mortality and culling in the late nursery phase. Although pre-weaning Ht and Hb were initially lower, these differences resolved after weaning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sobrevia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fecfe9b9154b0b82876de7https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag107.126
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper