Retrospective cohort analysis examines GLP-1 therapy effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 1 diabetes, suggesting positive implications.
AIMS: Evidence on cardiovascular/renal outcomes associated with GLP-1-based therapies in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is limited. We examined the effects of GLP-1-based therapy on major clinical outcomes and safety, including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hypoglycemia risk, in adults with T1D in a large real-world cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilised the TriNetX global health research network. Adults with T1D were classified by exposure to GLP-1-based therapies. Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced baseline characteristics for age, sex, demographic characteristics, cardiometabolic risk factors, comorbidities, medication use, and laboratory parameters including lipid profile and glycemic control. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, heart failure (HF), adapted major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-all CV clinical outcomes), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and all-cause hospitalisation, plus safety outcomes (hypoglycemia and DKA). Event accrual began 6 months after therapy initiation. RESULTS: After matching, 4088 individuals per group were included. GLP-1-based therapy was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98), HF (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.67), adapted-MACE (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.94) and all-cause hospitalisation (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.96). No significant differences were observed for myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or CKD. DKA incidence was not increased, while hypoglycemia risk was lower with GLP-1 therapy (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95). Less than 10 (0.2%) events of pancreatitis were noted in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched real-world cohort of adults with T1D, GLP-1-based therapy was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, HF, adapted-MACE, hospitalisation, and hypoglycemia without increased DKA risk. Randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tentolouris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: