Evaluates Scabiosa atropurpurea's effects on ram sperm quality, indicating enhanced preservation methods.
• AES improves biochemical stability of frozen–thawed ram semen • Extender supplementation enhances membrane integrity • Oral AES strengthens systemic antioxidant defenses • Combined strategy reduces cryo-induced sperm damage • Natural antioxidant approach for semen preservation This study evaluated the effects of oral supplementation with Scabiosa atropurpurea aqueous extract (AES) and/or its inclusion in the semen extender on the post-thaw semen quality and oxidative status of ram semen. Ten “ Queue Fine de l’Ouest” rams were assigned to either a control (n = 5) or a treated group (n = 5) receiving AES orally (50 mL/day, 2 mg/kg). Semenwas collected, pooled, and divided into five aliquots, then diluted with extenders containing 0–1 g/L AES, resulting in 10 experimental conditions. After thawing, several parameters were assessed: sperm motility, kinetics, viability, morphology, membrane integrity, oxidative stress markers (TAS, TOS, OSI, MDA), ATP and Ca²⁺ concentrations, DNA fragmentation, and HSP70levels. Oral AES supplementation did not significantly affect total motility (P > 0.05); however, itimproved antioxidant status by increasing TAS (22.0 ± 0.5 vs. 20.3 ± 0.3 mmol/L; P< 0.05) and reducing MDA (5.2 ± 0.3 vs 3.5 ± 0.3 µmol/L; p < 0.05) and OSI (1.1 ± 0.0 vs 0.7 ± 0.0; P < 0.05). The inclusion of AES in the extender reduced the proportion of damaged spermatozoa (24.0 ± 1.1% vs. 37.7 ± 1.2%; P < 0.05) and improved both the ATP ratio (2.1 ± 0.0 vs. 0.9 ± 0.0mg/L per g protein) and Ca²⁺ concentration (32.9 ± 1.0 vs. 22.6 ± 1.1 mg/L per g protein; P< 0.05). The combined supplementation protocol (2 mg/kg oral AES + 1 g/L extender AES) provided the most effective protection against oxidative stress and significantly enhanced membrane integrity, ATP production, and Ca²⁺ levels in post-thaw sperm. In conclusion, AES supplementation improves the biochemical stability and cellular integrity of cryopreserved ram semen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Derbali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: