This analysis reveals risk transmission challenges to financial stability in China, suggesting a comprehensive compliance response system.
The rapid expansion of global stablecoins is generating new challenges for monetary sovereignty, financial stability, and cross-border regulatory governance. This paper develops an integrated analytical framework of “risk transmission–institutional constraints–compliance response–dynamic monitoring” to examine how stablecoin-related risks may be transmitted into China’s financial system. Drawing on financial risk theory, institutional analysis, and comparative regulatory perspectives, the study identifies three major channels of risk transmission: monetary sovereignty erosion, financial stability shocks, and regulatory arbitrage accompanied by legal and data-governance challenges. It argues that the actual impact of these risks is shaped by China’s specific institutional and technological conditions, including cross-border jurisdictional frictions, technical standard barriers, coordination difficulties under “one country, two systems”, and limitations in regulatory technology capacity. On this basis, the paper proposes a multi-layered compliance response system centered on risk-based penetrative supervision, strict corporate compliance boundaries, and the digital renminbi (e-CNY) as core infrastructure, while emphasizing the need for stronger international regulatory coordination. It further introduces a dynamic monitoring perspective to evaluate regulatory effectiveness, risk suppression, and the substitution effect of the e-CNY ecosystem. The paper contributes a structured and policy-oriented framework for understanding and containing external stablecoin risks in China’s institutional context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: