PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Structural Invariants, Memory, and Modular Diagnostics of Recamán's Sequence

View Full Paper
RRRicardo Hernández Reveles

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to understand the decision dynamics of Recamán's sequence using historical states and modular diagnostics.
  • Examined the recurrence of Recamán's sequence through historical states defined as H_n = (a(n), S_n).
  • Utilized empirical diagnostics up to N = 10^7 to observe modular equidistribution and run-length statistics.
  • Verified computational claims with a parallelized Python script and provided machine-readable results.
  • Modular equidistribution was achieved with a discrepancy D_m < 10^{-5} for tested moduli.
  • Identified regime fractions: BWD = 50.0%, FWD(P) = 28.8%, and FWD(M) = 21.2%.
  • Run-length statistics indicated that 99.94% of runs were unit runs, with maximum run-length 6 first seen at N = 10^7.

Abstract

Structural Invariants, Memory, and Modular Diagnostics of Recamán's Sequence We analyze the decision dynamics of Recamán's sequence \ (a (n) \) (OEIS A005132) through the binary direction sequence \ (ₙ \-1, +1\ \) and its run-length encoding. The exact recurrence is deterministic on historical states \ (Hₙ = (a (n), Sₙ) \), not on \ (a (n) \) alone; all modular and spectral diagnostics are treated as projections of this exact dynamics. Unconditional results. E1 (Triangular Identity). For all \ (n 0 \): \ (a (n) = T (n) - 2W (n) \), where \ (T (n) = n (n+1) /2 \) is the \ (n \) -th triangular number and \ (W (n) \) is the sum of backward-step indices. E2 (Mod-2 Rigidity). For all \ (n 0 \): \ (a (n) T (n) 2 \). The direction sequence is invisible modulo 2; parity follows the deterministic period-4 pattern of the triangular numbers. This constitutes a 2-adic shadow structurally reminiscent of the role of \ (₂ (3q+1) \) in the Collatz/Syracuse problem. I2 (FWD-2 Exclusion). No forward run of \ ( (ₙ) \) has length exactly 2. If a forward run reaches length 2, the backward target collapses algebraically to \ (a (n-2) S \), forcing a third consecutive forward step. Tripartite Decomposition. Every step falls into exactly one of: BWD, FWD (P) (positivity failure, locally decidable), or FWD (M) (congestion — the unique locus of historical self-reference, requiring the full occupation set \ (S₍-₁ \) ). Projection Incompleteness. No representation that collapses two historical states with different freshness outcomes can factor the exact recurrence. This is an obstruction criterion: it does not assert that two such histories occur in the single realized trajectory, but that any proposed projected closure must rule out freshness collisions. Null-Model Benchmark. Under \ (H₀ \) (i. i. d. Rademacher signs independent of phase), the phase-averaged transition matrix on \ (Z/mZ \) is exactly \ (J/m \) (uniform), with spectral gap 1. This provides a calibration reference, not a generative model. Parity Obstruction. For \ (m = 2ᵏ \), \ (k 2 \), the \ (m \) -step return preserves parity: \ (a (n+m) a (n) 2 \). Empirical diagnostics (verified to \ (N = 10⁷ \) ). Modular equidistribution: discrepancy \ (Dₘ 0. 94 \) for the tested odd moduli; halved to \ (0. 49 \) at \ (m = 2ᵏ \), consistent with E2. Regime fractions: BWD = 50. 0%, FWD (P) = 28. 8%, FWD (M) = 21. 2%. Run-length statistics: 99. 94% unit runs; FWD lengths in \ (\1, 3, 4, 5, 6\ \) ; length 6 first attained at \ (N = 10⁷ \). Coverage density \ (N 0. 113 \) at \ (N = 10⁷ \). Conjectural roadmap and the reconstructive gap. A hierarchy of conjectural dependencies connects the Sloane coverage conjecture to congestion boundedness, run-length pseudorandomness, first-order phase balance, and modular diagnostics. The key gap is reconstructive: the projected process modulo \ (m \) does not retain the exact historical set \ (Sₙ \), so even strong modular diagnostics cannot decide whether a future backward candidate is genuinely fresh. Reproducibility. All computational claims are verified by the accompanying parallelized Python script (verifyᵣecamanᵥ075. py, 8-core adaptive via Unix fork, ~15s wall at \ (N = 10⁷ \) ). Machine-readable results in VERDICTᵥ075. json. Epistemic discipline. All results are classified into four levels: unconditional theorems, null-model theorems, empirical diagnostics, and conjectural dependencies. No empirical observation is promoted beyond its verified status.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ricardo Hernández Reveles (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed0e2b9154b0b82877f67https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20060380
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Structural Invariants and External Connections of Recamán's Sequence2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Structural Invariants and External Connections of Recamán's Sequence2026
  3. 3Boundary Dynamics of a Pseudo-Recamán Recurrence2026
  4. 4r/LLMmathematics Monthly Conjectures: Open Problems, Theorems, and Exact Evidence2026
  5. 5A Modular Route to the Riemann Hypothesis via Spectral Tails and Background Dominance2025