Objectives/Goals: To advance the clinical utility of a risk calculator for identifying young children’s mental health risk, we: 1) replicate an established mental health risk algorithm in two toddler-preschool samples; 2) determine added predictive value of child and parenting assets, advancing a strengths-based approach; and 3) discuss next steps for implementation. Methods/Study Population: Data were from two studies: A population-based Cohort 1 (N=2,763) and an independent risk-enriched Cohort 2 (N=323). In Cohort 1, children (48% girls) were 51.9% Black, 21.4% White, and 2.7% Other Race; 23.8% were Hispanic. In Cohort 2, children (44% girls) were 49.2% White, 38.1% Black, and 8.4% Other Race; 11.1% were Hispanic. Risks and assets were assessed in toddlerhood/early-preschool, and psychopathology was measured later in preschool. Epidemiologic risk prediction methods were applied to: 1) replicate the published risk model that includes demographics, irritability, and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs); 2) examine added predictive utility of child and parenting assets. Predictive utility was based on area under the curve (AUC) and/or the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Results/Anticipated Results: The previously published risk algorithm that includes demographics, child irritability, and child ACEs was replicated in both cohorts (AUC=.70 for both; IDI=.07 in Cohort 1 and .06 in Cohort 2). Via the IDI, there was added predictive utility of child assets (i.e., social competence) in both cohorts (IDI=0.008 in Cohort 1 and 0.02 in Cohort 2), as well as added predictive utility of parenting assets (i.e., parenting involvement/self-efficacy) in Cohort 1 (IDI=0.004). Preliminary evidence for barriers/facilitators regarding early childhood mental health screening in pediatric primary care and preschool settings will also be discussed, as part of a roadmap for future implementation of the calculator in routine care. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Improving early mental health risk algorithms through a strengths-based lens is essential for evidence-based and equitable decision-making. We have laid the groundwork for future implementation of a mental health decision tool in routine care of young children, from pediatric primary care to preschool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacNeill et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: