Examines response time linked to premotor processing in adolescents, suggesting implications for developmental research.
= 1.73) completed a flanker task while EEG was recorded. We quantified the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) to fractionate RTs into premotor (stimulus-locked LRP [S-LRP]) and motor (response-locked LRP [R-LRP]) intervals. Both S-LRP and R-LRP latencies correlated with RT, but only S-LRP latency decreased with age. Mediation analysis confirmed a significant indirect effect of age on RT through S-LRP latency but not R-LRP latency, suggesting that faster processing speed among older adolescents stems from faster premotor-but not motor-processing. We demonstrate the utility of using LRP latencies to investigate domain-specific processing speed, highlighting directions for future work to link structural development research to functional measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slawson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: