Key result
An ongoing trial compares a 12-week culinary nutrition intervention to standard education for psychological health.
Why the study?
Although diet quality influences psychological health, this relationship remains under-explored in studies designed to improve diet quality.
Does a 12-week culinary-focused nutrition education intervention improve psychological health and well-being in healthy adults compared to standard nutrition education?
RCT (n=55)
randomized
Does a 12-week culinary-focused nutrition education intervention improve psychological health and well-being in healthy adults compared to standard nutrition education?
An ongoing pilot study is evaluating whether a 12-week culinary-focused nutrition education program improves psychological health and well-being compared to standard printed materials.
Culinary nutrition education may support psychological well-being alongside diet quality; leaves open routine adoption pending larger confirmatory RCTs.
Objectives/Goals: Although diet quality is known to influence psychological health, this is under-explored in studies designed to improve diet quality. This secondary analysis aims to investigate the effects of culinary-focused nutrition education relative to standard nutrition education on dimensions of psychological health and well-being. Methods/Study Population: This is an exploratory analysis of the SPICE UP MyPlate Pilot Study, a randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of a novel 12-week culinary-focused nutrition education intervention on diet quality relative to standard nutrition education in healthy adults aged 31–59 years. The intervention included eight modules focused on flavorful healthy eating. The control group received a printed MyPlate resource about healthy eating. Psychological health and well-being outcomes included depression and anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, loneliness, and psychological well-being. Linear mixed models will be used for analysis. Results/Anticipated Results: Data collection for the SPICE UP MyPlate Pilot Study is ongoing at the time of this writing and will be completed in December 2025. All baseline visits have been completed, and 55 participants have been randomized. At baseline, the sample is predominately female (76% female; 24% male) and White (91% White; 5% Asian; 4% African American) with a mean age of 46 ± 8 years and a mean BMI of 27.2 ± 6.39 kg/m2. Results of this analysis are anticipated to show the preliminary effectiveness of culinary-focused nutrition education compared to standard nutrition education on 1) depression and anxiety symptoms, 2) perceived stress, 3) loneliness, and 4) psychological well-being. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Poor diet quality and poor psychological health are independent risk factors for leading causes of death. Understanding the effectiveness of culinary-focused nutrition education for improving diet quality and psychological health is important for developing population-level interventions that meaningfully reduce disease risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tate et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in healthy adults (n=55). culinary-focused nutrition education vs. standard nutrition education (printed MyPlate resource) was evaluated on psychological health and well-being (depression and anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, loneliness). A 12-week culinary-focused nutrition education intervention is currently being evaluated in an ongoing randomized clinical trial of 55 healthy adults to determine its effects on psychological health.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: