Evaluates multidimensional well-being index's association with preterm birth outcomes in postpartum Black women, indicating vital implications for health equity.
Objectives/Goals: The objectives of this project were to (1) develop a multidimensional well-being index, reflecting personal capacities and environmental conditions, and (2) evaluate its association with preterm birth. The goal of this investigation was to illustrate the value of multidimensional well-being for understanding health outcomes. Methods/Study Population: The LIFE study was a retrospective cohort of postpartum US-born Black women (ages 18+) recruited 2009–2011 from a suburban Detroit hospital. Eligible participants self-identified as African American, had singleton births, and spoke English; exclusions included incarceration, cognitive impairment, or serious mental health conditions. Trained interviewers collected survey and medical data during postpartum stays. Of 1,410 recruits (71% response), 1,177 had complete data. Key variables were binarized; logistic regression models assessed associations with preterm birth. Results/Anticipated Results: Few of the 21 binarized variables showed individual statistical significance. Significant predictors included having someone to offer advice about a crisis or to listen when needing to talk about oneself or one’s problems, and self-rated physical and mental health satisfaction. Of the dimension scales, only the physical health scale (physical health rating, mental health rating, and mental health satisfaction) was significant. The overall well-being index was borderline significant for lower odds of preterm birth (OR=0.934, 95% CI: 0.887–1.002, p=0.0593), reaching significance when adjusted for maternal age (OR=0.938 95% CI: 0.883-0.998, p=0.0414). Discussion/Significance of Impact: This study’s findings underscore that well-being is best understood as a holistic interconnected construct. By centering context, this approach advances health equity, encourages systemic accountability and change, and inspires innovative public health research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: