PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Journal of Clinical and Translational Science0 citationsOpen Access

540 Amplifying community voices: Enhancing CE Studios through facilitator-led power sharing in translational research

ISIvory SimmsDCDelores CollinsETErika Trapl

Key Points

  • This study aims to enhance shared leadership in CE Studios by involving community facilitators in the process.
  • Community facilitators (N=35) were recruited to participate in the CE Studios beginning October 2024.
  • A four-phase innovation method was conducted to onboard facilitators and solicit feedback.
  • Facilitators engaged in phases including recruitment, training, and team integration during virtual or in-person sessions (N=4).
  • Enhanced community expert recruitment and shared leadership within CE Studios.
  • Improvement in CE Studio outcomes expected with facilitator guidance and innovation implementation.
  • Increased trust and quality of the CE Studio experience ultimately benefiting academic partnerships.

Abstract

Objectives/Goals: 1. Explore how to increase shared leadership of CE Studio by leveraging the expertise of community facilitators. 2. Understand processes implemented to enhance power sharing between community and academic partners participating in CE Studios. Methods/Study Population: In partnership with a community co-investigator, community members (N= 35) were recruited to serve as facilitators for the Northeast Ohio CTSC Community Engagement (CE) Studios starting in October 2024. A four-phase innovation method was conducted to onboard community facilitators and solicit feedback to increase power sharing during our CE Studios – Phase 1: Developing Facilitator Pipeline, Phase 2: Engaged Training and Development, and Phase 3: Enhancing Expert Experience. A selection of facilitators participated in virtual or in-person CE Studio (N= 4) to pilot Phase 4: Team Integration. Together, these innovations enhanced community expert recruitment and shared leadership of the CE Studio while strengthening the value of the CE Studio for investigators seeking community input. Results/Anticipated Results: We anticipate enhanced CE Studio outcomes by implementing community facilitator guidance and innovation throughout the CE Studio framework. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Empowering facilitators to provide their expertise throughout the full scope of the CE Studio framework through coaching, expert recruitment, training, investigator preparation, and reporting enhances the CE Studio experience. This power sharing increases trust and quality of the CE Studio experience and enhances academic partnerships.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Simms et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed10fb9154b0b828784b6https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10658
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sustained Community Involvement in Translational Research: Evaluating the Acceptability of a Multisession Community Engagement Studio Approach2025
  2. 2278 Evaluating Community Engagement Studios 2.0: Insights from applying an implementation framework2026
  3. 3270 Evaluation of a community studio program to integrate lived experience across translational research2026
  4. 4Community feedback sessions: An adaptation of the community engagement studio model to enhance scalability2026
  5. 5253 What is still needed?: Community conversations about health research2024