Randomized trial evaluates profitability of vegetable-based farming systems, indicating benefits for farmers.
The study assessed vegetable-based farming systems in the Koramangala-Challaghatta Valley project area of Kolar district, Karnataka, to evaluate their potential for improving net farm income. Four systems were identified: Vegetable + Cereals + Mulberry + Dairy (FS-I), Vegetable + Mulberry + Dairy (FS-II), Vegetable + Cereals + Dairy (FS-III), and Vegetable + Dairy (FS-IV). Using snowball sampling, 70 farmers were surveyed through a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Gini coefficient analysis were employed to assess profitability and income inequality among households. FS-I was the most commonly adopted system and, despite the highest costs, generated the highest returns (Rs. 2,15,603), followed by FS-II (Rs. 1,93,158). Systems with more diversified enterprises, like FS-I, showed higher profitability, with a return per rupee of expenditure of 1.41 for FS-I, 1.37 for FS-II, 1.34 for FS-IV, and 1.30 for FS-III. The Gini coefficient analysis revealed the lowest income inequality in FS-I (0.448), while FS-III showed the highest inequality (0.562). The findings suggest that diversified farming systems offer higher profitability and more balanced income distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavithra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: