We present a forecast-ready effective framework in which late-time cosmic acceleration arises not from a fundamental dark-energy substance but from a geometric response with causal memory. The construction is formulated as a minimal scalar-tensor theory in Jordan frame, where a coarse-grained macrostate, phi, couples covariantly through F(phi)R and evolves in response to a history functional G(a) defined operationally from coarse-grained structure growth. This removes the main arbitrariness that usually affects phenomenological late-time extensions: the closure is not introduced as an unspecified function of redshift, but is anchored to a computable proxy of gravitational entropy production derived from the filtered matter power spectrum. The same framework is then mapped into the standard observational language of modified cosmology through the scalar-sector response functions mu(a,k) and Sigma(a,k), the slip parameter eta(a,k), and the tensor-sector luminosity-distance ratio dLgw/dLem parameterized by (Xi0,n). A stable causal relaxation law supplies the memory sector, while an explicit environmental screening prescription guarantees compatibility with local gravity tests and predicts a built-in critical experiment in low-density regions. The resulting theory is strongest when interpreted as a design-study and falsification program: it delivers a non-arbitrary route to effective dark energy, a conditional pathway toward partial dark-sector unification on cosmological and intermediate scales, and a clear kill-switch structure based on growth, lensing, standard sirens, and void-based differential tests. Rather than overclaiming a full all-scale replacement of the dark sector, we show that the proposal can now be stated in publication-grade form as a sharply testable effective framework with coherent scalar, tensor, and environmental signatures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
César Daniel Reyna Ugarriza (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: