PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Economics of marketing of mango in south Konkan region of Maharashtra state

View Full Paper
ADA.C. DEORUKHAKARPKP. N. KumbharMNM.B. Nikam

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the marketing channels and pricing dynamics of mango in the South Konkan region of Maharashtra.
  • Identified five marketing channels for mango distribution.
  • Assessed price shares and gross margins in each channel.
  • Evaluated marketing efficiency based on producer's share in consumer price.
  • Producer's share in consumer price is highest at 95.02% in direct sales and lowest at 31.82% for pre-harvest contractors.
  • The gross margin of retailers in channel II is 22.95%, while co-operative societies achieve 15.49% in channel IV.
  • Marketing efficiency is highest in channel I, suggesting this as the most effective channel for producers.

Abstract

Mango is grown in all parts of Maharashtra state. However, it is not considered as commercial proposition except in Konkan region. In the year 2011 the area under mango in Maharashtra was 4.77 lakh ha with total production of 3.31 lakh MT. Total area under cultivation of mango in Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg districts is 60, 015 ha and 19, 270 ha, respectively. While aggregate production in south konkan region is about 96, 184 tonnes. (Anonymous 2010–11). It was observed that mango passes through five different channels of trade viz; I) Producer-consumer (direct sale) II) Producer-wholesaler/commission agent-retailer-consumer, III) Producer-pre-harvest contractor-wholesaler/commission agent-retailer-consumer, IV) Producer-co-operative society-consumer, V) Producer-fruit merchant-hawker-consumer. The price spread of mango fruits showed that the producer's share in consumer's price was highest (95.02 per cent) in channel I and it was lowest (31.82 per cent) in channel III. The producer's share in consumer's price in channel IV and V was 80.13 per cent and 63.85 per cent. In channel II it was 54.73 per cent, respectively. The gross margin of commission agents and retailers in channel II was 8.75 per cent and 22.95 per cent, respectively. The gross margin of pre-harvest contractors in channel III was 36.48 per cent, whereas, the gross margin of co-operative society in channel IV was 15.49 per cent, while fruit merchants and hawkers in channel V got 13.35 per cent and 17.99 per cent, margin respectively. The gross market margin was maximum in channel III (68.18 per cent), while, it was minimum in channel I (4.98 per cent). The marketing efficiency was highest in channel I and lowest in channel III. For marketing of mango, channel I was the most effi cient one but most of the cultivators sold their produce through commission agents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

DEORUKHAKAR et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed16ab9154b0b82878adahttps://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.399513
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper