Theoretical framework examines communication challenges in neurodiverse populations, highlighting ethical clarity and inclusion.
This paper adopts a theoretical-reflective approach grounded in neurodiversity studies, cognitive psychology, and inclusive accessibility frameworks. This article examines “obviousness” as a socially constructed communicative illusion that privileges implicit inference and marginalizes individuals with diverse cognitive processing styles. Drawing on neurodiversity studies, cognitive psychology, inclusive education, and accessibility frameworks, the paper argues that communication failures are frequently misattributed to individual deficits rather than structural imprecision. It proposes communicative clarity, specificity, repetition, and explicit validation as ethical practices that promote autonomy, reduce anxiety, minimize error, and enhance inclusion in educational and social contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Augusto Maia Baptista (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: