Evaluates job-domain phenomena and skill frameworks, indicating systematic structure in occupations.
Restricted bundle of 175 files comprising JOBMANITAI Term-Korpus + Job/Career-Phänomene: 143-Term Compendium-Markdown (NEOMANITAI v10.2.0, CC BY-ND 4.0), terms.csv mit 7-dim. Scores, training.jsonl (DE+EN), augmanitai.jsonld + .rdf (Linked-Data + RDF/XML), researcher_profile.jsonld (ORCID), CITATION.cff, zenodo_metadata.json, sitemap.xml, plus 70+ per-term HTMLs (productivity-arbitrage, collaborative-intelligence-design, symbiotic-work-state, the-accountability-deficit, the-agent-handshake, the-algorithmic-fairness, the-anti-instrumentalization-principle, the-apprentice-paradox, the-automation-perimeter, the-decision-unburdening, the-delegation-dance, the-invisible-colleague, the-knowledge-silo-break, the-quiet-co-pilot, the-trust-infrastructure, etc.). Plus Generation-Report (143 Terme, 99.3% DEPLOY mit 7-dim. Scores), Backbone-Korpus mit canonical_id + DE/EN-Definitionen + distinctions + in_workplace-Examples, JOBMANITAI_V2 wissenschaftliche Project-Definition (ISO 704/1087/30042-Framework, ~200-300 Job-AI-Intersection-Terme) + Architecture + Occupational-Taxonomy (Tech/Finance/Customer-Service/Manufacturing) + Skill-Framework (Domain-Expertise + AI-Tool-Proficiency + Meta-Competencies). Strict-Wissenschaft.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreas Ehstand (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: