Activation of N(2) by (silox)(3)Ta (1, silox = (t)Bu(3)SiO) to afford (silox)(3)Ta═N-N═Ta(silox)(3) (1(2)-N(2)) does not occur despite ΔG°(cald) = -55.6 kcal/mol because of constraints of orbital symmetry, prompting efforts at an independent synthesis that included a study of REH(2) activation (E = N, P, As). Oxidative addition of REH(2) to 1 afforded (silox)(3)HTaEHR (2-NHR, R = H, Me, (n)Bu, C(6)H(4)-p-X (X = H, Me, NMe(2)); 2-PHR, R = H, Ph; 2-AsHR, R = H, Ph), which underwent 1,2-H(2)-elimination to form (silox)(3)Ta═NR (1═NR; R = H, Me, (n)Bu, C(6)H(4)-p-X (X = H (X-ray), Me, NMe(2), CF(3))), (silox)(3)Ta═PR (1═PR; R = H, Ph), and (silox)(3)Ta═AsR (1═AsR; R = H, Ph). Kinetics revealed NH bond-breaking as critical, and As > N > P rates for (silox)(3)HTaEHPh (2-EHPh) were attributed to (1) ΔG°(calc)(N) < ΔG°(calc)(P) ∼ ΔG°(calc)(As); (2) similar fractional reaction coordinates (RCs), but with RC shorter for N < P∼As; and (3) stronger TaE bonds for N > P∼As. Calculations of the pnictidenes aided interpretation of UV-vis spectra. Addition of H(2)NNH(2) or H(2)N-N((c)NC(2)H(3)Me) to 1 afforded 1═NH, obviating these routes to 1(2)-N(2), and formation of (silox)(3)MeTaNHNH2 (4-NHNH(2)) and (silox)(3)MeTaNH(-(c)NCHMeCH(2)) (4-NH(azir)) occurred upon exposure to (silox)(3)Ta═CH(2) (1═CH(2)). Thermolyses of 4-NHNH(2) and 4-NH(azir) yielded [(silox)(2)TaMe](μ-N(α)HN(β))(μ-N(γ)HN(δ)H)[Ta(silox)(2)] (5) and [(silox)(3)MeTa](μ-η(2)-N,N:η(1)-C-NHNHCH(2)CH(2)CH(2))[Ta(κ-O,C-OSi(t)Bu(2)CMe(2)CH(2))(silox)(2)] (7, X-ray), respectively. (silox)(3)Ta═CPPh(3) (1═CPPh(3), X-ray) was a byproduct from Ph(3)PCH(2) treatment of 1 to give 1═CH(2). Addition of Na(silox) to [(THF)(2)Cl(3)Ta](2)(μ-N(2)) led to [(silox)(2)ClTa](μ-N(2)) (8-Cl), and via subsequent methylation, [(silox)(2)MeTa](2)(μ-N(2)) (8-Me); both dimers were thermally stable. Orbital symmetry requirements for N(2) capture by 1 and pertinent calculations are given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulley et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: