Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DP-bioglass paste has been demonstrated to produce 60 microm of sealing depth on exposed dentinal tubules. However, the occlusive effect depended on a continuous placement of DP-bioglass paste on dentinal surface for three days. In a bid to fabricate highly reactive DP-bioglass particles, a sol-gel method was used together with HNO3, NaOH, and H3PO4 as catalysts. As a result, the application time of DP-bioglass paste was significantly reduced to 10 minutes. Percentage of tubular occlusion with DP-bioglass was 53.2-65.4%, while One Coat Bond and Seal & Protect yielded 51.3% and 41.2% respectively. Further, the average depth of tubular occlusion with DP-bioglass was 55.8-62.7 microm, while One Coat Bond and Seal & Protect produced 40.8 microm and 32.5 microm respectively. In conclusion, the best sealing performance of tubular occlusion was rendered by DP-bioglass catalyzed with HNO3. Its performance was significantly better than Seal & Protect, and was considered to exhibit the greatest potential in treating dentin hypersensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: