PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 25, 2016PLoS ONE520 citationsOpen Access

DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models

SBSankar BasuUniversity of CalcuttaBWBjörn WallnerLinköping University

Key Points

  • Develop and validate DockQ, a unified continuous quality metric combining multiple structural parameters to evaluate protein-protein docking models.
  • Integrated fraction of native contacts (Fnat), ligand root-mean-square deviation (LRMS), and interface root-mean-square deviation (iRMS) into a single continuous metric scaled from 0 to 1.
  • Validated the metric against existing CAPRI (Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions) classification datasets.
  • DockQ reproduced the discrete CAPRI classification tiers (Incorrect, Acceptable, Medium, High) with an average positive predictive value of 94% at 90% recall without requiring manual ad-hoc cutoffs.
  • Provided a high-resolution, continuous distribution that enables quantitative model ranking, Z-score calculation, and use as an objective function for machine learning algorithms.

Abstract

The state-of-the-art to assess the structural quality of docking models is currently based on three related yet independent quality measures: Fnat, LRMS, and iRMS as proposed and standardized by CAPRI. These quality measures quantify different aspects of the quality of a particular docking model and need to be viewed together to reveal the true quality, e.g. a model with relatively poor LRMS (>10Å) might still qualify as 'acceptable' with a descent Fnat (>0.50) and iRMS (<3.0Å). This is also the reason why the so called CAPRI criteria for assessing the quality of docking models is defined by applying various ad-hoc cutoffs on these measures to classify a docking model into the four classes: Incorrect, Acceptable, Medium, or High quality. This classification has been useful in CAPRI, but since models are grouped in only four bins it is also rather limiting, making it difficult to rank models, correlate with scoring functions or use it as target function in machine learning algorithms. Here, we present DockQ, a continuous protein-protein docking model quality measure derived by combining Fnat, LRMS, and iRMS to a single score in the range 0, 1 that can be used to assess the quality of protein docking models. By using DockQ on CAPRI models it is possible to almost completely reproduce the original CAPRI classification into Incorrect, Acceptable, Medium and High quality. An average PPV of 94% at 90% Recall demonstrating that there is no need to apply predefined ad-hoc cutoffs to classify docking models. Since DockQ recapitulates the CAPRI classification almost perfectly, it can be viewed as a higher resolution version of the CAPRI classification, making it possible to estimate model quality in a more quantitative way using Z-scores or sum of top ranked models, which has been so valuable for the CASP community. The possibility to directly correlate a quality measure to a scoring function has been crucial for the development of scoring functions for protein structure prediction, and DockQ should be useful in a similar development in the protein docking field. DockQ is available at http://github.com/bjornwallner/DockQ/.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Basu et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff6f21413f0c047f2d63c6https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161879
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper